This case was last updated from Kern County Superior Courts on 03/29/2020 at 04:36:16 (UTC).

BRIGHT VS MCMILLIN TUSCANY LLC

Case Summary

On 10/02/2013 BRIGHT filed a Property - Construction Defect lawsuit against MCMILLIN TUSCANY LLC. This case was filed in Kern County Superior Courts, Kern County Metropolitan Division located in Kern, California. The Judges overseeing this case are Brumfield, Lorna H., Clark, Thomas S. and Schuett, Stephen D.. The case status is Disposed - Dismissed.
Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    *********0439

  • Filing Date:

    10/02/2013

  • Case Status:

    Disposed - Dismissed

  • Case Type:

    Property - Construction Defect

  • County, State:

    Kern, California

Judge Details

Judges

Brumfield, Lorna H.

Clark, Thomas S.

Schuett, Stephen D.

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs

BRIGHT, MICHAEL

BOJORQUEZ, HERNAN

BOJORQUEZ, MARIA I.

HINOJOSA, FRED

MAHAR, MICHAEL

MAHAR, NATALIE

PARRA, MARIBEL

MONSIBAIS, MANUEL

54 More Parties Available

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorney

GUTHRIE, LORI J

Attorney at SHINNICK & RYAN LLP

1810 State St

San Diego, CA 92101

Other Attorneys

BLAKE, KIMBERLY A

KENNEDY, KEVIN P

MCNEILL, TIMOTHY C

PEZOLD, DANIEL G

STEAD, CALVIN R

ARABI, ARASH S

MALCOLM, STACEY L

HAMMONS, WALLACE W

EBNER, DARREN M

HAZELTON, M TROY

CRAWFORD, DAVID

CRESPO, DANIEL A

MCCLAIN, ROBYN S

 

Court Documents

Electronic Rejection Notice

Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: To: Calvin R. Stead Re: Case Management Statement Reason: Case Management Statement is not set for Calendar. Per conversation accepted in error.

Electronic Rejection Notice

Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: To: Calvin R Stead Re: Request for dismissal Reason: Per conversation will resubmit with the correct cross defendant names answered.

Electronic Rejection Notice

Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: To: Attorney Calvin R Stead Re: Request for Dismissal Reason: We already received and filed request for Dismissal for Entire Case

Electronic Rejection Notice

Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: 2nd rejection: Date Cross-Complaint was filed is incorrect. Also, the address of the court is 1415 Truxtun Ave. Please make corrections and re-submit. Returned via efile

Electronic Rejection Notice

Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: Re: Request for Dismissal, Per phone conversation with Tamara on 01/03/2020 corrections need to be done to party names listed on page 3 (attachment)

Electronic Rejection Notice

Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: A request was filed with the Court on 02/15/2017 to Dismiss McClure Door, Inc., a California Corporation dba Central Valley Overhead Door Only.

Electronic Rejection Notice

Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: Proof of Service has a section for " Court Use Only" Please separate from declaration and file as a separate document.

Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal

Order to Show Cause in re: Dismissal 10/28/2019: Judicial Officer: Clark, Thomas S.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Result: Continued - Court's Motion Hearing; Comment: as to X- Complaint McMillin Tuscany, LLC, et al., Pursuant to CRC 3.1385

Electronic Rejection Notice

Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: Request for Dismissal: Several Reasons: Court Address listed is incorrect and page 2 of the form is missing. Please correct and resubmit.

45 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 01/07/2020
  • DocketNotice of Entry of Dismissal

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/07/2020
  • DocketNotice of Entry of Dismissal - Comment: & Proof of Service As to Cross Complaint, Entire Action

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/07/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketElectronic Rejection Notice - Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: To: Attorney Calvin R Stead Re: Request for Dismissal Reason: We already received and filed request for Dismissal for Entire Case

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/07/2020
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketElectronic Rejection Notice - Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: To: Calvin R Stead Re: Request for dismissal Reason: Per conversation will resubmit with the correct cross defendant names answered.

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/07/2020
  • DocketOrder to Show Cause in re: Dismissal - Judicial Officer: Clark, Thomas S.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Cancel Reason: Dismissal Filed; Comment: as to the Complaint only WHY ENTIRE MATTER SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CRC 3.1385

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/07/2020
  • DocketOrder to Show Cause in re: Dismissal - Judicial Officer: Clark, Thomas S.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Cancel Reason: Dismissal Filed; Comment: as to Guinn Corporation FKA Irv Guinn Construction only

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/07/2020
  • DocketOrder to Show Cause in re: Dismissal - Judicial Officer: Clark, Thomas S.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Cancel Reason: Dismissal Filed; Comment: as to X- Complaint McMillin Tuscany, LLC, et al., Pursuant to CRC 3.1385

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/06/2020
  • DispositionDiposition: Judgment - Judicial Officer: Clark, Thomas S.; Judgment Type: Dismissal-Entry of Request for Dismissal-Before Trial(CL/CV)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/06/2020
  • DispositionDiposition: Judgment - Judicial Officer: Clark, Thomas S.; Judgment Type: Dismissal-Entry of Request for Dismissal-Before Trial(CL/CV)

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 01/06/2020
  • DocketRequest for Dismissal (Entire) - Comment: With prejudice As to Entire Case As to Cross Complaint McMillin Management Services LP

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
681 More Docket Entries
  • 12/23/2013
  • DocketProof of Service - Summons / Complaint - Comment: AS TO MCMILLIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, L.P. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SUB SERVICE 12/16/2013

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 12/23/2013
  • DocketProof of Service - Summons / Complaint - Comment: AS TO MCMILLAN TUSCANY LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY SUB SERVICE 12/16/2013

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 11/05/2013
  • DocketSummons Issued and Filed - Comment: LORI J. GUTHRIE, ESQ., COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 10/09/2013
  • DocketCONV - Comment: Amount of $1,000.00 for BRIGHT, MICHAEL (PL-1). Received from MICHAEL BRIGHT, check no(s) 305628. Receipt #742511 for amount of $1,000.00.

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 10/09/2013
  • Docket800Q Pmt: New Suit - Unlimited Civil GC 70611 (8/6/12) - Comment: Amount of $435.00 for BRIGHT, MICHAEL (PL-1). Received from MICHAEL BRIGHT, check no(s) 305627. Receipt #742510 for amount of $435.00.

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 10/08/2013
  • DocketRejection/Correction Notice - Comment: TO: LORI J. GUTHRIE VIA ACS RE: BRIGHT VS MCMILLIN TUSCANY LLC Case No. S-1500-CV-280439, LHB NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS X The attached SUMMONS papers are being returned for the following reason(s): X Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE. Calendar Notes: TO: LORI J. GUTHRIE VIA ACS RE: BRIGHT VS MCMILLIN TUSCANY LLC Case No. S-1500-CV-280439, LHB NOTICE OF REJECTION / REQUEST FOR CORRECTIONS X The attached SUMMONS papers are being returned for the following reason(s): X Summons does not conform to Complaint / Cross-Complaint. ANY CORRESPONDENCE REQUIRING AN ANSWER FROM THE COURT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A STAMPED, SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPE.

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 10/08/2013
  • DocketOrder to Show Cause - Comment: NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110 TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON Jan 15, 2014 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT_17 OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT TO GIVE ANY LEGAL REASON WHY SANCTIONS SHALL NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT ON ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS AND FILE PROOF(S) OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110. ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY, UNLESS FIVE (5) COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED THE REQUIRED PROOF(S) OF SERVICE, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY. Calendar Notes: NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110 TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL: YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR ON Jan 15, 2014 AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT_17 OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT TO GIVE ANY LEGAL REASON WHY SANCTIONS SHALL NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE THE COMPLAINT ON ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS AND FILE PROOF(S) OF SERVICE WITH THE COURT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS AFTER THE FILING OF THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 3.110. ALL APPEARANCES ARE MANDATORY, UNLESS FIVE (5) COURT DAYS PRIOR TO HEARING DATE THE COURT HAS RECEIVED THE REQUIRED PROOF(S) OF SERVICE, THEN NO APPEARANCE IS NECESSARY.

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 10/08/2013
  • DocketCONV - Comment: New case created by deputy: 145

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 10/02/2013
  • DocketCivil Case Cover Sheet (CM-010) - Comment: FILED BY LORI J. GUTHRIE

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less
  • 10/02/2013
  • DocketComplaint - Fast Track - Comment: FILED BY LORI J. GUTHRIE CMC SET 4/1/2014 @8:15AM DEPT 17

    [+] Read More [-] Read Less

Complaint Information

Envelope Details Page 1 of 3

Print this page

Case # S1500CV280439 - BRIGHT VS MCMILLIN TUSCANY LLC (Clark, Thomas S.)

% S1500CV280439

: BRIGHT VS MCMILLIN TUSCANY LLC ® Clark, Thomas S.

. Nora Boardman

: Law Offices of John A. Hauser

Robert T Defilippis E §5.15

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

MICHAEL BRIGHT, et al., )} CASE NO. S-1500-CV-280439-LHB ) Plaintiffs, ) CROSS-DEFENDANT, JORGE ) DIAZ,ROE 7, ANSWER TO vs. ) CROSS-COMPLAINT OF ) MCMILLIN TUSCANY, LLC,ET McMILLIN TUSCANY, LLC, et al,, ) AL. ) Defendants. ) JUDGE: HON. THOMAS S. CLARK ) DEPT: DEPT: 17 AND ALL RELATED CROSS ACTIONS. ) ) Date Action Filed: Trial Date:

COMES NOW, Cross-Defendant, JORGE DIAZ, ROE 7 (hereinafter “cross-defendant™), and answers the unverified Cross-Complaint of MCMILLIN TUSCANY, LLC, ET AL. (hereinafter “cross-complainants”™), by alleging as follows:

1. Pursuant to Section 431.30 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, this cross- defendant denies each and every material allegation contained in the Cross-Complaint, and further specifically denies the cross-complainants have been damaged in the sum or sums alleged, or in any other sum or sums or at all, by any action or omission on the part of this

answering cross-defendant.

answering cross-defendant. Calvin R. Stead, Esq.; SBN 129358 BORTON PETRINI, LLP

Calvin R. Stead, Esq.; SBN 129358 BORTON PETRINI, LLP

5060 California Avenue, Suite 700 Post Office Box 2026

Bakersfield, California 93303-2026 Tel: (661) 322-3051

Fax: (661) 322-4628 cstead@bortonpetrini.com

Attomneys for MCMILLIN TUSCANY LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, MCMILLIN TUSCANY VILLAS LLC, MCMILLIN PORTOLA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, MCMILLIN, VENECIA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, MCMILLIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LP., a California Limited Partnership, CORKY MCMILLIN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC., a California Corporation, CENTRAL VALLEY RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS, L.P, a California Limited Partnership, BAKERSFIELD RESIDENTIAL BUILDERS, L.P., a California Limited Partnership

O 66 ~1 O W b W N

— b e N e O

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF KERN, METROPOLITAN DIVISION MICHAEL BRIGHT, an individual, et al., Case No. Case No. S-1500-CV-280439-LHB Plaintiffs, AMENDMENT TO CROSS-COMPLAINT

NAMING ROE 7 AS JORGE DIAZ AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

—_— N W

MCMILLIN TUSCANY LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, et al.,

Defendants.

& 8 = I

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS.

K O /11 270111 284711/

R\Public\0557 '

60068341 - 1 D S

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases represented by Lawyer BLAKE KIMBERLY A.

Latest cases represented by Lawyer Robyn S McClain

Latest cases represented by Lawyer STEAD, CALVIN R

Latest cases represented by Lawyer Crawford, David III