BARRY BENDER VS WORKMED CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Case Summary
Case Details
-
Case Number:
*********0536
-
Filing Date:
03/11/2016
-
Case Status:
Disposed - Dismissed
-
Case Type:
Contract - Other Contract
-
Court:
-
Courthouse:
-
County, State:
Kern, California
Judge Details
Judges
Lampe, David R.
Clark, Thomas S.
Party Details
Plaintiff
BENDER, BARRY
Defendants
R.P. DUNNUM, MD INC.
DUNNUM, RUSSELL P.
CALHOUN, KEVIN, M.D.
WORKMED CALIFORNIA, APC
R.P. DUNNUM, MD, INC., AKA RUSSELL P. DUNNUM, INC DBA WORKMED, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ENTITY NUMBER C3545970
CALHOUN, KEVIN
WORKMED CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORA
MACARTHUR, ROBERT
Attorney/Law Firm Details
Plaintiff Attorney
KESTNER, DAVID
Defendant Attorney
MCNEIL, MALCOLM S.
Court Documents
**MO w/Declaration of Mailing 3.110 MO: Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Result: Held
Case Management Conference 09/12/2016: Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Result: Continued - Party's Motion Hearing; Parties Present Plaintiff; Attorney: KESTNER, DAVID
Case Management Conference: Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Result: Held; Parties Present Plaintiff; Attorney: KESTNER, DAVID
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: Proposed Order rejected in File & Serve
Order to Show Cause (Pre-Disposition) 01/31/2017: Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Result: Held; Comment: re: default judgment; Parties Present Plaintiff; Attorney: KESTNER, DAVID
Case Management Conference 03/28/2017: Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Result: Continued - Party's Motion Hearing; Parties Present Plaintiff; Attorney: KESTNER, DAVID
Minute Order Dated 6-1-17: Hearing Time: 8:00 AM; Result: Ruling
Rejection/Correction Notice: Comment: RE: Motion - Missing ResID
Case Management Conference 06/30/2017: Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Result: Held
Minute Order Dated 9-13-17: Hearing Time: 08:30 AM; Result: Ruling
Case Management Conference 10/24/2017: Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Result: Held; Comment: Cont'd from 06/30/2017
Rejection/Correction Notice: Comment: Answer to First Amended Complaint returned via USPS
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: Date in 1(b) has already past. Please specify a different date.
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: Proof of service needs proper face page.
Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: Duplicate filing of Dismissal, Proof of service needs to be re-submitted with proper face page.
Docket Entries
- 10/15/2018
-
DocketCourt Trial - Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Hearing Time: 9:00 AM; Cancel Reason: Dismissal Filed; Comment: t/e 1 days
- 10/12/2018
-
DocketFinal Case Management Conference - Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Hearing Time: 01:30 PM; Cancel Reason: Dismissal Filed; Comment: court trial 10/15/18 t/e 1 day
- 09/14/2018
-
DocketMandatory Settlement Conference - Judicial Officer: Clark, Thomas S.; Hearing Time: 9:00 AM; Cancel Reason: Dismissal Filed
- 08/30/2018
-
DocketMotion to Quash (Pre-Disposition) - Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Cancel Reason: Other; Comment: 08/03/2018, Defendants: Kevin Calhoun, M.D. and Workmed Claifornia, APC., Motin to Quash Subpoenas and Monetary Sactions for Misuse of the Discovery Process, ResID: 32643
- 08/28/2018
-
DocketNotice - Comment: Notice of Defendants Kevin Calhoun, M.D. and Workmed California, APC Taking Off-Calendar thier Motion to Quash Subpoenas and Monetary Sanctions
- 08/27/2018
-
DispositionDiposition: Judgment - Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Judgment Type: Dismissal-Entry of Request for Dismissal-Before Trial(CL/CV)
- 08/27/2018
- View Court Documents
-
DocketElectronic Rejection Notice - Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: Duplicate filing of Dismissal, Proof of service needs to be re-submitted with proper face page.
- 08/27/2018
- View Court Documents
-
DocketElectronic Rejection Notice - Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: Proof of service needs proper face page.
- 08/27/2018
-
DocketRequest for Dismissal (Entire) - Comment: Without prejudice as to entire action.
- 08/24/2018
- View Court Documents
-
DocketElectronic Rejection Notice - Electronic Rejection Notice: Comment: Date in 1(b) has already past. Please specify a different date.
- 08/29/2016
-
DocketApplication and Order - Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Comment: to Serve the California Secretary of State
- 08/01/2016
-
DocketDeclaration of Non-Service - Comment: 2 attempts
- 07/22/2016
-
DocketDeclaration of Non-Service - Comment: AS TO WORKMED CALIFORNIA,1 ATTEMPT
- 06/27/2016
- View Court Documents
-
DocketOrder to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 - **MO w/Declaration of Mailing 3.110 MO: Judicial Officer: Lampe, David R.; Hearing Time: 8:30 AM; Result: Held
- 03/29/2016
-
DocketSummons Issued and Filed - Comment: On Complaint
- 03/14/2016
-
DocketCivil and Small Claims Documents - Served: 10/26/2016
- 03/14/2016
-
DocketRejection/Correction Notice - Comment: SUMMONS
- 03/14/2016
-
DocketOrder to Show Cause - Comment: Re:CRC 3.110 Hearing Date: 6/27/16 Hearing Time: 830AM Hearing Department/Division:11
- 03/11/2016
-
DocketCivil Case Cover Sheet (CM-010)
- 03/11/2016
-
DocketComplaint
Complaint Information
ARENT FOX LLP
555 West Fifth Street, 48th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013-1065
Telephone: 213.629.7400
Facsimile: 213.629.7401
Email: malcolm.mcneil@arentfox.com ismael.bautista@arentfox.com
e e ———————e e e e et ™
! . \ | Attorneys for Defendants KEVIN CALHOUN, M.D. and WORKMED CALIFORNIA, APC
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN }
BARRY BENDER, CASE NO. BCV-16-100536 Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS KEVIN CALHOUN, M.D.’S AND WORKMED CALIFORNIA, APC’S V. ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
WORKMED CALIFORNIA. a California Corporation, and Does 1 to 25, Defendant. Judge: Hon. David R. Lampe |
Action Filed: March 11, 2016 Tral Date: N/A
Defendants Kevin Calhoun, M.D. (*Dr. Calhoun™) and Workmed California, APC (“Workmed™) (together, “Defendants’™) hereby answer the First Amended Complaint (the
“Complaint™) of Plaintift Barry Bender (“Plaintiff”) as follows:
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30(d), Detendants generally deny each
| GENERAL DENIJAL i
- . . ~, . . ’ and every allegation contained in the Complaint, deny that Plaintiff has suffered any injury. i
damage or loss by reason of any act or omission on their part, deny specifically that Plaintift has |
Dig Deeper
Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases