This case was last updated from Fresno County Superior Courts on 07/12/2022 at 16:31:33 (UTC).

XXXXX

Case Summary

On 12/03/2013 XXXXX was filed as a Property - Other Real Property lawsuit. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts, Fresno County BF Sisk Courthouse located in Fresno, California. The Judges overseeing this case are Simpson, Alan, Ikeda, Dale, Snauffer, Mark, Smith, M. Bruce and Hamilton, Jeffrey Y.. The case status is Disposed - Dismissed.
Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    *******3739

  • Filing Date:

    12/03/2013

  • Case Status:

    Disposed - Dismissed

  • Case Type:

    Property - Other Real Property

  • County, State:

    Fresno, California

Judge Details

Judges

Simpson, Alan

Ikeda, Dale

Snauffer, Mark

Smith, M. Bruce

Hamilton, Jeffrey Y.

 

Party Details

Plaintiffs

Montoya, Vincent

Montoya, Rosemary

Vincent and Rosemary Montoya

Defendants

EMC Mortgage LLC

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

U.S. Bank National Association

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc

Quality Loan Service Corp

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorney

Barak, Danny A

United Law Center 3013 Douglas Blvd, Ste 200

Roseville, CA 95661

Defendant Attorney

Sorich, John M.

 

Court Documents

Opposition filed

1626854_000RJNISOOpp; Comment: Plaintiffs' Request for Judicial Notice in support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

Letter of Documents Returned Without Filing

Letter of Documents Returned Without Filing; Comment: Plaintiffs' Notice of Change of Address

Proof of Service

Proof of Service; Comment: MPA,Response, Statement, Evidentiary Objections, DF, DF

Notice of Motion

Notice of Motion; Comment: and Motion for: Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication

Opposition filed

1626854_274PAsISOOpp; Comment: Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

Notice Filed

Notice Filed; Comment: of Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Order to Specially Set Date to Hear Motion to Compel Responses to Supplemental Interrogatories and Supplemental Requests for Production

Statement filed

Statement filed; Comment: of Defendant in Response to Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for an Order Continuing the Trial Date and Discovery Cut-Off

Judgment

Request for Dismissal filed; Judgment Type: Request for Dismissal filed; Party Names: Montoya, Vincent; Montoya, Rosemary; EMC Mortgage LLC; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; U.S. Bank National Association; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc; Quality Loan Service Corp; Vincent and Rosemary Montoya; Comment: With Prejudice

Declaration Filed

Declaration Filed; Comment: of Mariel Gerlt-Ferraro in Support of Reply to Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication as to Plaintiffs' Complaint

1803147_156PLAReques

11/14/2017: 1803147_156PLAReques

32669 - notice.pdf

10/19/2017: 32669 - notice.pdf

Stipulation and Order to Continue Trial filed

10/12/2017: Stipulation and Order to Continue Trial filed

Stipulation and Order

10/06/2017: Stipulation and Order

Minute Order Attachment (Tentative Rulings Only)

07/19/2017: Minute Order Attachment (Tentative Rulings Only)

Order Appointing Court Approved Reporter

07/12/2017: Order Appointing Court Approved Reporter

Minute Order Attachment

07/12/2017: Minute Order Attachment

Reply

06/15/2017: Reply

Objection

06/15/2017: Objection

129 More Documents Available

 

Docket Entries

  • 11/21/2019
  • FinancialFinancial info for Montoya, Rosemary: Counter Payment Receipt # CIVIL-2019-00014288 Montoya, Rosemary $23.50

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/21/2019
  • FinancialFinancial info for Montoya, Rosemary: Transaction Assessment $23.50

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/21/2019
  • FinancialFinancial: Montoya, Rosemary; Total Financial Assessment $23.50; Total Payments and Credits $23.50

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/30/2018
  • DocketJury Trial; Judicial Officer: Hamilton, Jeffrey Y.; Hearing Time: 9:00 AM; Cancel Reason: Dismissed

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/27/2018
  • DocketTrial Readiness; Judicial Officer: Hamilton, Jeffrey Y.; Hearing Time: 9:30 AM; Cancel Reason: Dismissed

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 04/10/2018
  • DocketMandatory Settlement Conference; Hearing Time: 10:00 AM; Cancel Reason: Dismissed

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/14/2017
  • DispositionDisposition: Judgment; Judgment Type: Request for Dismissal filed; Party; Names: Montoya, Vincent; Montoya, Rosemary; EMC Mortgage LLC; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; U.S. Bank National Association; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc; Quality Loan Service Corp; Vincent and Rosemary Montoya; Comment: With Prejudice

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 11/14/2017
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketRequest for Dismissal Received - Pending Review; Comment: Plaintiffs' Request for Dismissal

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/19/2017
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketNotice Filed; Comment: of Entry of Order Approving Joint Stipulation to Continue Mandatory Settlement Conference, Tr

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 10/12/2017
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketStipulation and Order to Continue Trial filed; Judicial Officer: Simpson, Alan; Comment: JT to 04/30/2018 at 9:00 AM in Dept. # 501 TRR to 04/27/2018 at 9:30 AM in Dept. # 501 MSC to 04/10/2018 at 10:00 AM in RM. # 575 Signed by Judge Simpson

    Read MoreRead Less
159 More Docket Entries
  • 12/30/2013
  • DocketPOS of summons & comp personal; Comment: Proof of service of summons and complaint filed showing personal service on Quality Loan Service Corp on 12/11/2013 . le

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/03/2013
  • FinancialFinancial info for Montoya, Vincent: Counter Payment Receipt # 184714 Montoya, Vincent $435.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/03/2013
  • FinancialFinancial info for Montoya, Vincent: Transaction Assessment $435.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/03/2013
  • FinancialFinancial: Montoya, Vincent; Total Financial Assessment $705.00; Total Payments and Credits $705.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/03/2013
  • DocketNotice of Case Mgnt Conf; Comment: Docket entry for the letter produced from CSAEVNT on 03-DEC-2013 by LESPARZA.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/03/2013
  • DocketPayment; Comment: A Payment of -$435.00 was made on receipt CVCE184714.

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/03/2013
  • DocketSummons filed; Comment: Summons on Complaint filed. le

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/03/2013
  • DocketZ_Conversion; Comment: le Event: Civil complaint filed

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/03/2013
  • DocketCivil case cover sheet; Comment: Civil Case Cover Sheet

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 12/03/2013
  • DocketZ_Conversion; Comment: Event: New Civil Case Filed

    Read MoreRead Less

Complaint Information

law. (Complaint, 9 40.)

On or about December 30, 2011, an assignment of deed of trust was recorded, which memorialized in the public record, the transfer of all beneficial interest in the DOT to U.S. Bank as successor trustee for the Trust. (RJN, Exhibit 2 attached thereto.)

Thereafter, the trustee under the Deed of Trust recorded a Notice of Default and Election to Sell on the Property. (RJN, Exhibit 3 attached thereto.) A Notice of Trustee’s Sale was recorded on April 3, 2012; and a second Notice of Trustee’s Sale was recorded on April 4, 2012. (RJIN, Exhibits 4-5 attached thereto.) Plaintiffs allege that on or about May 3, 2012, the Property was sold at a non- judicial foreclosure sale. (Complaint, 4 97.) A Trustee’s Deed Upon Sale was recorded on May 22, 2012. (RJN, Exhibit 6 attached thereto).

III. LAW GOVERNING MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Under Code of Civil Procedure, § 438(c)(1)(B)(i1), a defendant may move for judgment on the pleadings where “[t]he complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action...” The enactment of section 438 was a codification of the common law motion for judgment on the pleadings which the California Supreme Court has held remains in effect. (Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Lyons (2000) 24 Cal. 4th 468, 482, fn. 2.)

A defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings may be made after the time to demur has expired and an answer has been filed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438(1)(2).) Moreover, “[a] motion for judgment on the pleadings may be made at any time either prior to the trial or at the trial itself.” (Stoops v. Abbassi (2002) 100 Cal. App. 4th 644, 650; see Lucas v. County of Los Angeles (1996) 47 Cal. App. 4th 277, 284-285 [granting in limine motion for judgment on the pleadings held to be a proper exercise of court’s inherent powers to control litigation]; see also Code Civ. Proc., § 430.80 [grounds for general demurrer are never waived].)

A motion for judgment on the pleadings “ha[s] the purpose and effect of a general demurrer.” (Kortmeyer v. California Ins. Guarantee Assn. (1992) 9 Cal. App. 4th 1285, 1293.) As the California Supreme Court held in Smiley v. Citibank (1995) 11 Cal. 4th 138, at 145:

In ruling on a common law motion for judgment on the pleadings made by a defendant, a trial court determines what has been called a pure question of law (Citations omitted), but what is in fact a mixed question of law and fact that is predominantly legal: Does the plaintiff’s complaint state facts

2 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; MEMORANDUM

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases where EMC MORTGAGE CORP. (EMC) is a litigant

Latest cases where U.S. Bank National Association is a litigant

Latest cases where Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. is a litigant

Latest cases where JPMorgan Chase Bank NA is a litigant