This case was last updated from Fresno County Superior Courts on 06/19/2022 at 10:26:59 (UTC).

The People of the State of California vs. Jasdip Boyal

Case Summary

On 06/06/2018 The People of the State of California filed a Contract - Business lawsuit against Jasdip Boyal. This case was filed in Fresno County Superior Courts, Fresno County BF Sisk Courthouse located in Fresno, California. The Judge overseeing this case is Black, Donald. The case status is Disposed - Judgment Entered.
Case Details Parties Documents Dockets

 

Case Details

  • Case Number:

    *******2018

  • Filing Date:

    06/06/2018

  • Case Status:

    Disposed - Judgment Entered

  • Case Type:

    Contract - Business

  • County, State:

    Fresno, California

Judge Details

Judge

Black, Donald

 

Party Details

Plaintiff

The People of the State of California

Defendant

Boyal, Jasdip Kaur

Attorney/Law Firm Details

Plaintiff Attorneys

MURPHY, TY M

Murphy, Ty M.

 

Court Documents

Civil case cover sheet

Civil Case Cover Sheet

Civil Complaint filed

Complaint

Stipulation Filed

Proposed Order; Comment: For entry of Final Judgment

Order Received for Signature

Proposed Order; Comment: Signed and retruned to clerk's office for further processing Forwarded to Dept: 502 Order for: Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction

Judgment

Stipulated Judgment Entered; Judicial Officer: Black, Donald; Judgment Type: Stipulated Judgment Entered; Party Names: The People of the State of California; Boyal, Jasdip Kaur; Judgment - Monetary Award; Awarded To:; The People of the State of California; Awarded Against:; Boyal, Jasdip Kaur; Amount; Damages: $500.00; Total: $500.00

Civil Case Cover Sheet

06/06/2018: Civil Case Cover Sheet

Complaint

06/06/2018: Complaint

Proposed Order

06/06/2018: Proposed Order

Proposed Order

06/06/2018: Proposed Order

 

Docket Entries

  • 06/08/2018
  • DispositionDisposition: Judgment; Judicial Officer: Black, Donald; Judgment Type: Stipulated Judgment Entered; Party; Names: The People of the State of California; Boyal, Jasdip Kaur; Judgment - Monetary Award; Awarded To; The People of the State of California; Awarded Against; Boyal, Jasdip Kaur; Amount; Damages: $500.00; Total: $500.00

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/07/2018
  • DocketChambers Work- Pre; Judicial Officer: Black, Donald; Hearing Time: 5:30 PM; Result: Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/06/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketOrder Received for Signature; Comment: Signed and retruned to clerk's office for further processing Forwarded to Dept: 502 Order for: Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/06/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketStipulation Filed; Comment: For entry of Final Judgment

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/06/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketCivil Complaint filed

    Read MoreRead Less
  • 06/06/2018
  • View Court Documents
  • DocketCivil case cover sheet

    Read MoreRead Less

Complaint Information

FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

By: A. Ramos, Deputy

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF Civil Case No.: 18CECG02018 CALIFORNIA., D.A. Case No.: 2017-B-9315 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT INJUNCTION, CIVIL PENALTIES, INJUNCTIVE AND v. OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF.

JASDIP KAUR BOYAL, individually and dba FOOD KING & LIQUOR; (1576 N. First St. Fresno, CA 93703),

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) )

) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through LISA A.

SMITTCAMP, District Attorney of Fresno County, California, allege as follows:

1. Lisa A. Smittcamp, District Attorney of Fresno County, California, acting to protect the public from fraud, deception, and misleading, unlawful, unfair and fraudulent business practices, brings this action in the name of the People of the State of California.

2. The District Attorney’s authority to bring this action derives from

common law and from statute including, but not limited to, Business and Professions

O 0 1 N

terms of the prior injunction is a violation of Business and Professions Code section 17207.

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

Injunctive Relief (Business and Professions Code §§ 17203, 17204 and 17205)

1S. Plaintiff hereby incorporates all of paragraphs 1 through 14, inclusive, of this Complaint as though fully set forth at length herein.

16. Plaintiff 1s informed and believes and thereupon alleges that unless enjoined and festrained by order of this Court, said Defendants will continue to engage in the aforementioned described unlawful conduct in derogation of the rights and interests of the general public as consumers and competitors of Defendants.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, Plairlltiff prays for the following:

1. That, pursuant to the First Cause of Action, this Court assess a Civil penalty in the amount of TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($2,500.00) for each violation of Business and Professions Code § 17200, according to proof, but in no event less than TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000.00).

2. That pursuant to the Second Cause of Action, this court assess a Civil penalty in the amount of SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS ($6,000.00) for each violation of Business and Professions Code section 17207, according to proof, but in no event less than TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($25,000.00).

3. That, pursuant to the Third Cause of Action, that Defendant, their directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives, and any and all persons who are acting in concert or participating in any manner with them, or any of them, be permanently enjoined and restrained, directly or indirectly, from engaging in the acts of unfair competition as set forth in this complaint.

related-case-search

Dig Deeper

Get Deeper Insights on Court Cases


Latest cases represented by Lawyer MURPHY, TY M