On 06/19/2018 a Contract - Debt Collection case was filed by Genpro, INC against Gurmeet Singh in the jurisdiction of Fresno County Superior Courts, Bf Sisk Courthouse located in Fresno, California.
*******2208
06/19/2018
Pending - Other Pending
Fresno County Superior Courts
Bf Sisk Courthouse
Fresno, California
Black, Donald
Genpro, INC.
West Coast Carrier
Singh, Gurmeet
163273 DECLARATION RE INTEREST.pdf; Comment: Declaration of Rodolfo Gaba, Jr. in Support of Calculation of Accrued Interest
163273 REQUEST FOR ENTRY.pdf; Comment
Minute Order Attachment
Notice of Hearing; Comment: CMC/CJAP Hearing
SUMMONS.pdf; Summons issued and filed
SUMMONS.pdf; Summons issued and filed
COMPLAINT.pdf
VENUE.pdf; Comment: re: Venue
CCCS.pdf
Request to Enter Default Denied; Comment: Line # 1.a. is incorrect. (no action taken on Judgment as Default was denied)
163273 Case Management Statement.pdf; Comment: filed by Plaintiff
163273 PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE.pdf
Request to Enter Default Denied; Comment: Line # 1.a. is incorrect, also no proof of service filed. ( No action taken on Judgment as Default was denied)
Dismissal of Doe Defendant(s); Comment: Without Prejudice Does: 1-10
163273 DECLARATION 1033.pdf; Comment: Declaration of Rodolfo Gaba, Jr. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1033
163273 JUDGMENT.pdf; Comment: No action taken on Judgment as Default was denied.
163273 CASE SUMMARY.pdf; Comment: Declaration re Underlying Action for Open Book Account
163273 DISMISSAL OF DOES.pdf
Case Management Conference- Judicial Officer: Tharpe, D Tyler; Hearing Time: 3:30 PM
Minute Order Attachment- Minute Order Attachment
Case Management Conference- Original Type: Case Management Conference; Judicial Officer: Tharpe, D Tyler; Hearing Time: 3:30 PM; Result: Heard
Dismissal Not Entered- Dismissal Not Entered; Comment: Request for dismissal filed. Dismissal not entered as requested for the following reason: Previously dismissed
Request to Enter Default Denied- Request to Enter Default Denied; Comment: Line # 1.a. is incorrect. (no action taken on Judgment as Default was denied)
Judgment Received- Judgment; Comment: no action taken on Judgment as Default was denied
Request Filed- Request; Comment: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DOES 1-10
Declaration Filed- Declaration; Comment: Declaration of Rodolfo Gaba, Jr., In Support of Calculation of Accrued Interest
Declaration Filed- Declaration; Comment: Declaration of Rodolfo Gaba, Jr., In Support of Request for Attorney's Fees PUrsuant to Civil Code 1717.5
Declaration Filed- Declaration; Comment: Declaration in Lieu of Testimony In Support of Request for Entry of Default Judgment, Pursuant to CCP 585(d)
Notice of Change of Address Filed- Notice of Change of Address
Case Management Statement Filed- Case Management Statement
Notice of Hearing- Notice of Hearing; Comment: CMC/CJAP Hearing
Summons issued and filed- SUMMONS.pdf; Summons issued and filed
Civil Complaint filed- COMPLAINT.pdf
Declaration Filed- VENUE.pdf; Comment: re: Venue
Civil case cover sheet- CCCS.pdf
Financial info for Genpro, INC.: EFile Payment Receipt # WEB-2018-44794 Genpro, INC. $435.00
Financial info for Genpro, INC.: Transaction Assessment $435.00
Financial: Genpro, INC.; Total Financial Assessment $435.00; Total Payments and Credits $435.00
RUDY GABA, JR. (STATE BAR NO. 230475) E-FILED
23141 VERDUGO DRIVE, SUITE 205 6/19/2018 5:07 PM LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA 92653 FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT TELEPHONE: 949-207-7100 By: S. Lopez, Deputy
FACSIMILE: 949-207-7108 EMAIL: RGABA@GABALAWCORP.COM
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF, GENPRO, INC.
FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO, B.F. SISK COURTHOUSE
GENPRO, INC., Case No.: 18CECG02208 C
Plaintiff, OMPLAINT FOR:
1. OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT
2. ACCOUNT STATED
VS. g GURMEET SINGH, individually and g 3. REASONABLE VALUE
DOES 1 1o 16, inclusive, DEMAND: $27,752.42 befendants . UNLIMITED CIVIL TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Plaintiff, GENPRO, INC. (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) alleges the following causes of action against GURMEET SINGH, individually and dba WEST COAST CARRIER and DOES 1 to 10, INCLUSIVE (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendants”) as follows:
1. Plaintiff is, and at all times relevant was, a corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of its incorporation.
1. Plaintiff is, and at all times relevant was, a corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of its incorporation. 2. Plaintiff alleges on information and belief that the Defendants, or some of them, maintain their residence within the above-referenced County and Judicial District.
2. Plaintiff alleges on information and belief that the Defendants, or some of them, maintain their residence within the above-referenced County and Judicial District.
3. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Defendants DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sues said Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff alleges on information and belief that each of the Defendants designated herein as a fictitiously named Defendant is, in some manner, responsible for the events and happenings referred to, either contractually or tortuously, and/or that such fictitiously named Defendants claim that some right, title or interest to the property described herein below and/or that such fictitiously named Defendants are in some manner liable for the obligation described herein below. When Plaintiff ascertains the true names and capacities of DOES 1 to 10, Plaintiff will amend this Complaint accordingly.
4., Plaintiff alleges on information and belief that at all times herein mentioned, all Defendants named herein each acted in concert and conspired with or aided and abetted each other to do the acts complained of in this Complaint, and that each Defendant acted as an agent for the other at all times.
5. Plaintiff alleges on information and belief that the obligation sued upon 1is not subject to the provisions of California Civil Code sections 2984.4 and 1812.10.
(As To ALl Defendants)
6. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 to 5, above, and incorporates them herein by reference.
7. Within four (4) years past, prior to the commencement of this action, Defendant became indebted to Plaintiff on an open book account for a principal balance$27,752.42.
8. Demand has been made on Defendants for said sum of $27,752.42, but they have failed and refused and continue to fail and refuse to pay said sum, and the whole thereof is now due, owing and payable together with interest at the legal rate.
(As To ALl Defendants)
9. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 to 8, above, and incorporates them herein by reference.
10. Within four (4) years past, prior to the commencement of this action, there was an account stated by and between Plaintiff and Defendants, on which stated account the principal sum of $27,752.42 was agreed upon as the principal balance due to said Plaintiff from Defendants, which sum Defendants promised and agreed to pay.
11. Demand has been made on Defendants for said sum of $27,752.42, but they have failed and refused and continue to fail and refuse to pay said sum, and the whole thereof is now due, owing and payable together with interest at the legal rate.
(As To ALl Defendants)
12. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 to 11, above, and incorporates them herein by reference.
13. Within two (2) years past, prior to the commencement of this action, Defendants became indebted to Plaintiff for a balance due in the principal sum of $27,752.42, for goods, wares and merchandise, sold, furnished and delivered to Defendants at their special instance and request, and in the reasonable and agreed value of $27,752.42, which sum Defendants agreed to pay.
14. Demand has been made on Defendants for said sum of $27,752.42, but they have failed and refused and continue to fail and refuse to pay said sum, and the whole thereof is now due, owing and payable together with interest at the legal rate.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for Judgment against the Defendants, and each of them, as follows:
1. For the principal sum of $27,752.42, together with interest thereof at the legal rate of 10% per annum, according to proof;
2. For attorney’s fees incurred herein pursuant to California Civil Code section 1717.5;
3. For all costs incurred herein; and
4. For such further and other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
Dated: June 19, 2018 GABA LAW CORPORATION
RUDY GABA, JR. ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF, GENPRO, INC.