{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"UniCourt Blog","provider_url":"https:\/\/unicourt.com\/blog","author_name":"UniCourt","author_url":"https:\/\/unicourt.com\/blog\/author\/vivek\/","title":"A South Carolina Legal Technology Case is Likely Headed to the Supreme Court - Why You Should Care - Josh Blandi Writes in Law Technology Today &#8211; UniCourt Blog","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nUJ97Oz4X1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/unicourt.com\/blog\/naacp-v-kohn\/\">A South Carolina Legal Technology Case is Likely Headed to the Supreme Court &#8211; Why You Should Care &#8211; Josh Blandi Writes in Law Technology Today<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/unicourt.com\/blog\/naacp-v-kohn\/embed\/#?secret=nUJ97Oz4X1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;A South Carolina Legal Technology Case is Likely Headed to the Supreme Court &#8211; Why You Should Care &#8211; Josh Blandi Writes in Law Technology Today&#8221; &#8212; UniCourt Blog\" data-secret=\"nUJ97Oz4X1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/unicourtcache\/production\/blog_resources\/uploadsproduction\/blog_resources\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/03013302\/AdobeStock_518990999.jpg","thumbnail_width":868,"thumbnail_height":579,"description":"Josh Blandi discuss the implications of the court\u2019s ruling in NAACP v. Kohn et al for online access to court data, the future of the legal profession, and access to justice."}